- #NORTON ANTIVIRUS CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT INSTALL#
- #NORTON ANTIVIRUS CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT SOFTWARE#
- #NORTON ANTIVIRUS CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT CODE#
- #NORTON ANTIVIRUS CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT FREE#
YamaTough publically stated that the Lords of Dharmaraja never intended to make a deal with Symantec and told Reuters that, “we tricked them into offering us a bribe so we could humiliate them.”
#NORTON ANTIVIRUS CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT CODE#
The negotiations between YamaTough ultimately broke down and the hackers published the pcAnywhere source code on the internet. The complaint alleges that Symantec engaged in private email negotiations with YamaTough for a $50,000 payout in exchange for destroying the stolen source code and not publishing any more of it on the internet.Īs part of the proposed deal, Symantec allegedly required the hackers to proclaim that they lied about hacking into Symantec’s network and stealing the source code. Symantec initially denied that its internal network had been hacked, instead reporting that the hackers stole the source code from servers in India’s military and intelligence government agencies.
#NORTON ANTIVIRUS CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT SOFTWARE#
YamaTough, the pseudonym of the hacker who posted the documents, published at least two more documents on Google+ containing the source code of Symantec software products. On January 4, 2012, the Lords of Dharmaraja posted on what they claimed was confidential documentation pertaining to Norton Antivirus source code. The allegations contained in the complaint reveal the risks that corporations face in negotiating with hackers.
#NORTON ANTIVIRUS CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT INSTALL#
The lawsuit contends that, with the source code in hand, hackers can readily access computer systems without authorization, install malware and viruses, and leave software users vulnerable to data breaches and identity theft.
Furthermore, the complaint alleges that the software company failed to take any proactive measures to protect the security and functionality of its software until hackers publically revealed the breach in early 2012. According to the complaint, the Lords of Dharmaraja infiltrated Symantec’s computer network sometime in 2006 and stole the source code for several of its products including pcAnywhere, Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition, Norton Internet Security, and Norton SystemWorks.Īs alleged in the lawsuit, Symantec suspected in 2006 that its network had been breached and its source code stolen, but the company did not disclose the hack to its customers. On April 22, 2013, a customer of Symantec filed a putative class action lawsuit against the company arising out of the 2006 hack of Symantec by the Lords of Dharmaraja, the India-based chapter of the global hacker collective known as Anonymous. It isn’t quite the kind of behavior that you expect from a company with almost 20,000 employees and revenue of over $6 billion.If hackers steal the source code to a software company’s antivirus and remote-access programs, can the company continue to sell the compromised software without informing customers of the hack? The complaint alleges that the software company failed to take any proactive measures to protect the security and functionality of its software.Ī lawsuit filed against software giant Symantec, the makers of pcAnywhere and the popular Norton Antivirus suite of software products, presents this question to a federal district court in San Jose, California.
Then again, maybe cyber-criminals are about to clean out your bank account.” The hilariously hyperbolic threat in its entirety is pictured on the right. Your protection is history Maybe things will be OK for a while longer. Your Norton Internet Security has expired. Back in 2010, Symantec famously displayed the following threat to customers whose Norton antivirus subscriptions were about to expire: ”Time’s up. If it turns out that Symantec is fleecing Registry Mechanic customers, we wouldn’t be entirely surprised. The System Health meter, even though my system is virtually brand new, has the needle permanently stuck in the red unless I pay $29.99.
#NORTON ANTIVIRUS CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT FREE#
The free version appears to scan your computer, and even lets you click “fix these problems” - but in most cases it doesn’t actually do anything until you pay $29.99. Between a mix of buttons and text links, it isn’t clear what you need to click to perform various actions. The installer and the program itself use a buggy, confusing, non-standard skin.
In our own testing, Registry Mechanic definitely feels a bit iffy.
0 kommentar(er)
